![]() ![]() They are indeed meant to correct for a camera although you can apply LUTs from the Inspector regardless. If you have a LUT that is calibrated to your particular camera it may instantly bring it to near perfection and those LUTs are often used (in FCP) from within the Inspector panel and when they are applied any subsequent color grading is done "on top of" that LUT. The LUT will expand the brights and darks to give you a starting point. ![]() ![]() A LUT is often needed when shooting DLog or Dlog M as they are highly compressed in terms of dynamic range. It can be used without white in the image more or less but with white it can at least make that white a 'real' white. Can you suggest some free LUTs to correct the iPhone camera colors?īalance color depends on some white within the image to do a good job and then it essentially balances to that color. Question three: I shoot for talking-head style over a green-screen youtube videos with an iPhone SE. Maybe I misunderstood and they are for color grading instead? Question two: I understood that such camera-model named LUTs are for color correction. Question one: regardless of the camera, isn't it enough to use the "Balance color" function to correct the camera color? Why use camera-model named LUTs when we have the "Balance color" function? Now, in FCP there is the the "Balance color" function that seems to automatically color correct, and I think it "automatizes" the operation that I described in the previous paragraph - which make sense, being always the same process.Then, in L23 of the ripple training, it is mentioned that LUTs are used for correcting the color due to the curve that camera manifacturers "hard-code" inside different cameras models. The process of color correction through the exploitation of such tools is rather mechanical. by adjusting the exposure first and then the color with the help of tools like waveform, RGB parade, vectorscope, etc. So far, and in theory independently of FCP, I looked different videos that explains how to color correct your clips with some sort of "scientific" method, i.e. ONWARDS AND UPWARDS.I am following the core ripple training and in L23 LUTs are mentioned whereas in previous lessons the "Balance color" function has been explained. With Ripple Training and Mark Spencer’s no nonsense approach, I feel I can give it a good go. Now to the downside!!! I am buying into DaVinci Resolve, which I thought was a million miles from my comfort area. So my advice is just buy this tutorial (and the others) they are quite simply…. Sorry if that sound a bit too sentimental, it is completely true. Since COVID-19 wrecked my regular job, I have been working on filming and editing projects and it has literally saved my family from financial ruin. Now people are wanting to buy my photos and commissioning me for video work. I am not a full time professional videographer or photographer. ![]() My photos have been getting praise and my video work has really jumped to another level. I also bought the ‘lighting an interview’, ‘sound editing’ etc. How naive! I was simply blown away by how Mark Spencer broke down colour theory and gave me a far clearer understanding and consequently more confidence/freedom. I thought I just needed to understand the approach in FCPX. I had watched lots photoshop tutorials on colour. This will seem strange a strange comment, but as a user of Photoshop and studying it for years I thought I was not too inexperienced with my understanding of colour. They quite simply have grown into the best online teachers available. I have been a customer of Ripple Training for many, many years, following along on their MacBreak studio episodes. Download this outline Advanced Color Correction in Final Cut Pro 1. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |